- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 845C vs. John Deere 959J
Tigercat 845C vs. John Deere 959J
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 25490 kg and 36015.2 kg | 29 % less or 10525.2 kg |
Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 80 amperes | 43 % more or 60 amperes |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Booms
Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm and 5180 mm | 20 % less or 1015 mm |
7 reasons to buy John Deere 959J:
Sizes
Clearance | 770 mm and 690 mm | 10 % more or 80 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1117 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 147 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 121 l. |
Motor
Full power | 219 kW and 205.1 kW | 6 % more or 13.9 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 39145 kg and 27215.5 kg | 30 % more or 11929.5 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 9 | 10 % more or 1 |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm and 8050 mm | 6 % more or 480 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3435 mm and 3330 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm and 4000 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | 906 and 6081H |
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and John Deere |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 216 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm |
5. Clearance | 690 mm | 5. Clearance | 770 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3200 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8050 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm |
9. Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5180 mm |