- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 845C vs. Madill 2200B
Tigercat 845C vs. Madill 2200B
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 70 amperes | 50 % more or 70 amperes |
Carrier
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 Berco track chain roller on each side | 11 % more or 1 |
3 reasons to buy Madill 2200B:
Sizes
Clearance | 762 mm and 690 mm | 9 % more or 72 mm |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 205.1 kW | 10 % more or 22.3 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 34291.6 kg and 27215.5 kg | 21 % more or 7076.1 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm and 3657.6 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm and 2795 mm |
Overall width | 3435 mm and 3148.6 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Cummins |
Model | 906 and QSL |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4990 kg and 9888.3 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3148.6 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm |
5. Clearance | 690 mm | 5. Clearance | 762 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |