- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 860C vs. Tigercat 870C
Tigercat 860C vs. Tigercat 870C
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 27330 kg and 30331.7 kg | 10 % less or 3001.7 kg |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 870C:
Carrier
Traction force | 33112.2 kg and 27215.5 kg | 18 % more or 5896.7 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 5380 mm and 5540 mm |
Overall width | 3275 mm and 3300 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3300 mm |
Clearance | 710 mm and 710 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm and 1420 mm |
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 110 amperes |
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 970 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 190 l. |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL9 and QSL9 |
Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8460 mm |
Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm and 4800 mm |
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6040 kg and 6040 kg |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 5380 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5540 mm |
2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3300 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm |