- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L830C vs. John Deere 909J
Tigercat L830C vs. John Deere 909J
5 reasons to buy Tigercat L830C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 32658.6 kg and 34427.7 kg | 5 % less or 1769.1 kg |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm and 8360 mm | 0 % more or 20 mm |
Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 5030 mm | 35 % less or 1780 mm |
6 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:
Sizes
Clearance | 770 mm and 760 mm | 1 % more or 10 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 490 l. | 56 % more or 626.7 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 310.4 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 145.4 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 33701.9 kg and 33112.2 kg | 2 % more or 589.7 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 9 | 10 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 4000 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 216 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4585 kg and 6432 kg |
Alignment device
Front end | 26 degrees and 7 degrees |
Rear | 8 degrees and 26 degrees |
Lateral part | 22 degrees and 14 degrees |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm |
5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 770 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5030 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8360 mm |