- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L845C vs. John Deere 953J
Tigercat L845C vs. John Deere 953J
3 reasons to buy Tigercat L845C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 80 amperes | 43 % more or 60 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Booms
| Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm and 5638.8 mm | 26 % less or 1473.8 mm |
7 reasons to buy John Deere 953J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 749 mm and 685 mm | 9 % more or 64 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 31252.5 kg and 32480 kg | 4 % less or 1227.5 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 1117 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 147 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 121 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 219 kW and 205.1 kW | 6 % more or 13.9 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 33701.9 kg and 29937.1 kg | 11 % more or 3764.8 kg |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8686.8 mm and 8050 mm | 7 % more or 636.8 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm and 3200 mm |
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3170 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm and 3860 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and John Deere |
| Model | 906 and 6081H |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 610 mm |
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 216 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 5170 kg and 8164.7 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3170 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 685 mm | 5. Clearance | 749 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3200 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5638.8 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8050 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8686.8 mm |