- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L870C vs. John Deere 753J
Tigercat L870C vs. John Deere 753J
7 reasons to buy Tigercat L870C:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 136 l. | 28 % more or 54 l. |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 583 l. | 40 % more or 387 l. |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 179.7 kW | 20 % more or 44.0 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 33112.2 kg and 26036.2 kg | 21 % more or 7076.0 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8382 mm | 1 % more or 78 mm |
3 reasons to buy John Deere 753J:
Sizes
Clearance | 740 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 30 mm |
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 22897.3 kg and 35640 kg | 36 % less or 12742.7 kg |
Booms
Minimum cutting radius | 3200.4 mm and 4800 mm | 33 % less or 1599.6 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3180 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm and 3450 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm and 1930 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 203 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6032.8 kg and 4717.4 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3180 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3450 mm |
5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 740 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1930 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8382 mm |
9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3200.4 mm |