- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX822C vs. John Deere 853J
Tigercat LX822C vs. John Deere 853J
6 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Sizes
Clearance | 760 mm and 739 mm | 3 % more or 21 mm |
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219 kW | 2 % more or 4.7 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 29937.1 kg and 25265.1 kg | 16 % more or 4672.0 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Booms
Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 5000 mm | 35 % less or 1750 mm |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 853J:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 26675.8 kg and 32660 kg | 18 % less or 5984.2 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 490 l. | 56 % more or 626.7 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 310.4 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 145.4 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8400 mm and 8380 mm | 0 % more or 20 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3275 mm and 3170 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3780 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 203.2 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 609.6 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4581.3 kg and 6431.9 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3170 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3780 mm |
5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 739 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5000 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8400 mm |