- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX822C vs. Tigercat 860C
Tigercat LX822C vs. Tigercat 860C
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Sizes
Clearance | 760 mm and 710 mm | 7 % more or 50 mm |
Carrier
Traction force | 29937.1 kg and 27215.5 kg | 9 % more or 2721.6 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Booms
Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 4800 mm | 32 % less or 1550 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 490 l. | 49 % more or 480 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 165 l. | 13 % more or 25 l. |
Operational weight without attachment | 27330 kg and 32660 kg | 16 % less or 5330 kg |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8380 mm | 1 % more or 80 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4750 mm and 5380 mm |
Overall width | 3275 mm and 3275 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3300 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 110 amperes |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL9 and QSL9 |
Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 200 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4581.3 kg and 6040 kg |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5380 mm |
2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm |