vs.

      Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LH822C

      6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 1181 l. and 530 l. 55 % more or 651 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 370 l. and 165 l. 55 % more or 205 l.

      Motor

      Full power 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW 2 % more or 3.7 kW
      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 14 % more or 300 rev

      Booms

      Maximum radius with head 11300 mm and 8915 mm 21 % more or 2385 mm
      Lifting capacity at maximum radius 5700 kg and 4015 kg 30 % more or 1685 kg

      1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:

      Operation

      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 95 amperes 14 % more or 15 amperes

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Forward bend 20 degrees and 26 degrees
      Lateral tilt 11 degrees and 22 degrees
      Height to cab upper part 3962 mm and 3730 mm
      Overall width 3327 mm and 3400 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V
      Working weight 36000 kg and 31330 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Cummins
      Model C9 ACERT and QSL9

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 711 mm and 710 mm
      Caterpillar track pitch 215.9 mm and 203.2 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3327 mm 2. Overall width 3400 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3962 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3730 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 711 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 710 mm

      Booms

      8. Maximum radius with head 11300 mm 8. Maximum radius with head 8915 mm