- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LH822C
Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LH822C
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 530 l. | 55 % more or 651 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 165 l. | 55 % more or 205 l. |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm and 8915 mm | 21 % more or 2385 mm |
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5700 kg and 4015 kg | 30 % more or 1685 kg |
1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Forward bend | 20 degrees and 26 degrees |
Lateral tilt | 11 degrees and 22 degrees |
Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3730 mm |
Overall width | 3327 mm and 3400 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Working weight | 36000 kg and 31330 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 710 mm |
Caterpillar track pitch | 215.9 mm and 203.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3400 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |