- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Madill 1800 vs. Tigercat H860C
Madill 1800 vs. Tigercat H860C
5 reasons to buy Madill 1800:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1003.1 l. and 970 l. | 3 % more or 33.1 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
Clearance | 711.2 mm and 710 mm | 0 % more or 1.2 mm |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Caterpillar track length | 4876.8 mm and 4450 mm | 9 % more or 426.8 mm |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat H860C:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 189.3 l. | 0 % more or 0.7 l. |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 152.9 kW | 32 % more or 70.8 kW |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm and 9144 mm | 3 % more or 256 mm |
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 4626.6 kg | 14 % more or 733.4 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3785.6 mm and 3301 mm |
Overall width | 3453.4 mm and 3275 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 33565.8 kg and 27623.8 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB.5.9 and QSL9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 6604000 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3785.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm |
Carrier
4. Caterpillar track length | 4876.8 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4450 mm |
5. Clearance | 711.2 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 6604000 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 9144 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |