- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Madill 800 vs. Tigercat LH822C
Madill 800 vs. Tigercat LH822C
3 reasons to buy Madill 800:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 870.6 l. and 530 l. | 39 % more or 340.6 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Booms
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 4989.5 kg and 4015 kg | 20 % more or 974.5 kg |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 165 l. and 155.2 l. | 6 % more or 9.8 l. |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 138 kW | 38 % more or 85.7 kW |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm and 8686.8 mm | 3 % more or 228.2 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3709.4 mm and 3730 mm |
Overall width | 3301 mm and 3400 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 30163.9 kg and 31330 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB.5.9 and QSL9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 660.4 mm and 710 mm |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3301 mm | 2. Overall width | 3400 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3709.4 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 660.4 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8686.8 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |