- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H822C vs. Madill 1800
Tigercat H822C vs. Madill 1800
3 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 152.9 kW | 32 % more or 70.8 kW |
Carrier
| Clearance | 760 mm and 711.2 mm | 6 % more or 48.8 mm |
6 reasons to buy Madill 1800:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1003.1 l. and 490 l. | 51 % more or 513.1 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 189.3 l. and 165 l. | 13 % more or 24.3 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9144 mm and 8920 mm | 2 % more or 224 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 4626.6 kg and 3790 kg | 18 % more or 836.6 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3785.6 mm |
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3453.4 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 24494 kg and 33565.8 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSB.5.9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 6604000 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3785.6 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 711.2 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 6604000 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9144 mm |