- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H822C vs. Valmet 425.EX
Tigercat H822C vs. Valmet 425.EX
1 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm and 6530 mm | 27 % more or 2390 mm |
2 reasons to buy Valmet 425.EX:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 681 l. and 490 l. | 28 % more or 191 l. |
Booms
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5216 kg and 3790 kg | 27 % more or 1426 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 2660 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 24494 kg and 24165 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL9 and QSC |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 600 mm |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2660 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 6530 mm |