vs.

      Tigercat LH822C vs. Caterpillar 552

      1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:

      Operation

      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 95 amperes 14 % more or 15 amperes

      6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 370 l. and 165 l. 55 % more or 205 l.
      Fuel Capacity 1181 l. and 530 l. 55 % more or 651 l.

      Motor

      Full power 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW 2 % more or 3.7 kW
      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 14 % more or 300 rev

      Booms

      Maximum radius with head 11300 mm and 8915 mm 21 % more or 2385 mm
      Lifting capacity at maximum radius 5700 kg and 4015 kg 30 % more or 1685 kg

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Lateral tilt 22 degrees and 11 degrees
      Overall width 3400 mm and 3327 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3730 mm and 3962 mm
      Forward bend 26 degrees and 20 degrees

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V
      Working weight 31330 kg and 36000 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Caterpillar
      Model QSL9 and C9 ACERT

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track pitch 203.2 mm and 215.9 mm
      Shoe dimensions 710 mm and 711 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3400 mm 2. Overall width 3327 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3730 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3962 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 710 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 711 mm

      Booms

      8. Maximum radius with head 8915 mm 8. Maximum radius with head 11300 mm