- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat LH822C vs. Ponsse Bear
Tigercat LH822C vs. Ponsse Bear
1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 400 l. | 25 % more or 130 l. |
3 reasons to buy Ponsse Bear:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 350 l. and 165 l. | 53 % more or 185 l. |
Motor
Full power | 240 kW and 223.7 kW | 7 % more or 16.3 kW |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 11000 mm and 8915 mm | 19 % more or 2085 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Forward bend | 26 degrees and 20 degrees |
Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3860 mm |
Overall width | 3400 mm and 2990 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 31330 kg and 24500 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
Model | QSL9 and OM926LA |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3400 mm | 2. Overall width | 2990 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 11000 mm |