- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 320C FM vs. Tigercat S860C
Caterpillar 320C FM vs. Tigercat S860C
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320C FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 7 rev / min | 39 % more or 4.5 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 240 l. and 190 l. | 21 % more or 50 l. |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Maximum radius on ground level | 10980 mm and 10870 mm | 1 % more or 110 mm |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat S860C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 795 mm and 650 mm | 18 % more or 145 mm |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 50 amperes | 64 % more or 90 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 400 l. | 59 % more or 570 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 223.7 kW and 106.6 kW | 52 % more or 117.1 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Load-transfer height | 3300 mm and 3110 mm | 6 % more or 190 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3310 mm and 3630 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3066T diesel and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 915 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3310 mm | 2. Overall width | 3630 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 650 mm | 5. Clearance | 795 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10980 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10870 mm |
| 3. Load-transfer height | 3110 mm | 3. Load-transfer height | 3300 mm |