- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 325D FM vs. Tigercat 230C
Caterpillar 325D FM vs. Tigercat 230C
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 325D FM:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 8 rev / min | 20 % more or 2 rev |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 520 l. and 378 l. | 27 % more or 142 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 260 l. and 227.1 l. | 13 % more or 32.9 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 152.1 kW and 119.3 kW | 22 % more or 32.8 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
Maximum height | 13200 mm and 7600 mm | 42 % more or 5600 mm |
Maximum radius on ground level | 11500 mm and 9140 mm | 21 % more or 2360 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3620 mm and 2590 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 3020 mm and 2410 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 37806.9 kg and 13063.5 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C7 Acert and QSB6.7 3 level |
Boom/section specifications 1
Option - Boom/Section 1 | Under/Under and boom |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3620 mm | 2. Overall width | 2590 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 3020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
9. Maximum height | 14000 mm | 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm |
10. Maximum radius on ground level | 12000 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 9140 mm |