- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 330D FM vs. Tigercat 234
Caterpillar 330D FM vs. Tigercat 234
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 330D FM:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 600 l. and 378 l. | 37 % more or 222 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 410 l. and 227 l. | 45 % more or 183 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 199.8 kW and 129 kW | 35 % more or 70.8 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
Maximum height | 15000 mm and 7600 mm | 49 % more or 7400 mm |
Load-transfer length | 16630 mm and 9750 mm | 41 % more or 6880 mm |
Maximum radius on ground level | 12800 mm and 9750 mm | 24 % more or 3050 mm |
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 234:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 9 rev / min and 6.3 rev / min | 30 % more or 2.7 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3650 mm and 2590 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 3490 mm and 2790 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 45801 kg and 14855.1 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 80 amperes |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C9 Acert and QSB6.7 3 level |
Images
Sizes
8. Rear platform swing radius | 3490 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2790 mm |
2. Overall width | 3650 mm | 2. Overall width | 2590 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
1. Load-transfer length | 17320 mm | 1. Load-transfer length | 9750 mm |
9. Maximum height | 15600 mm | 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm |
10. Maximum radius on ground level | 13500 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 9750 mm |