- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 330D FM vs. Tigercat S860C
Caterpillar 330D FM vs. Tigercat S860C
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 330D FM:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 410 l. and 190 l. | 54 % more or 220 l. |
Boom/section specifications 1
Load-transfer height | 3470 mm and 3300 mm | 5 % more or 170 mm |
Maximum radius on ground level | 12800 mm and 10870 mm | 15 % more or 1930 mm |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat S860C:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 7 rev / min and 6.3 rev / min | 10 % more or 0.7 rev |
Sizes
Clearance | 795 mm and 760 mm | 4 % more or 35 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 600 l. | 38 % more or 370 l. |
Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 80 amperes | 43 % more or 60 amperes |
Motor
Effective power | 223.7 kW and 199.8 kW | 11 % more or 23.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3650 mm and 3630 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 45801 kg and 33660 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | C9 Acert and QSL9 |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 915 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3650 mm | 2. Overall width | 3630 mm |
5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 795 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
3. Load-transfer height | 3470 mm | 3. Load-transfer height | 3300 mm |
10. Maximum radius on ground level | 13500 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10870 mm |