- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- John Deere 335C vs. Caterpillar 325D FM
John Deere 335C vs. Caterpillar 325D FM
3 reasons to buy John Deere 335C:
Sizes
Clearance | 971.5 mm and 740 mm | 24 % more or 231.5 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 378 l. and 260 l. | 31 % more or 118 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 560 l/min and 470 l/min | 16 % more or 90 l/min |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 325D FM:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 9 rev / min | 10 % more or 1 rev |
Swing torque | 86316.8 Nm and 41600 Nm | 52 % more or 44716.8 Nm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 520 l. and 341 l. | 34 % more or 179 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 152.1 kW and 127 kW | 17 % more or 25.1 kW |
Displacement | 7.2 l. and 6.8 l. | 6 % more or 0.4 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 2493 mm and 3620 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4090 mm and 4820 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 2570 mm and 3020 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 12020 kg and 37806.9 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Manufacturer | John Deere and Caterpillar |
Model | 6068T and C7 Acert |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 15850 kPa and 34990.9 kPa |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 2493 mm | 2. Overall width | 3620 mm |
5. Clearance | 971.5 mm | 5. Clearance | 740 mm |
7. Height to cab upper part | 4090 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 4820 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 2570 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3020 mm |