- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Link-Belt 290LX vs. Tigercat 230C
Link-Belt 290LX vs. Tigercat 230C
5 reasons to buy Link-Belt 290LX:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 8.1 rev / min and 8 rev / min | 1 % more or 0.1 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 240 l. and 227.1 l. | 5 % more or 12.9 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 132 kW and 119.3 kW | 10 % more or 12.7 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Maximum radius on ground level | 11887.2 mm and 9140 mm | 23 % more or 2747.2 mm |
| Maximum height | 13716 mm and 7600 mm | 45 % more or 6116 mm |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 230C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 378 l. and 340 l. | 10 % more or 38 l. |
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 50 amperes | 37 % more or 30 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3640 mm and 2590 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 3180 mm and 2410 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 36016.1 kg and 13063.5 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and Cummins |
| Model | CC-6BG1TC and QSB6.7 3 level |
Hydraulic system
| Type of pump | piston pump and gear type with a triple section |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Option - Boom/Section 1 | 40'0" (12200mm) loading boom and boom |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3640 mm | 2. Overall width | 2590 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3180 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 9. Maximum height | 13716 mm | 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 11887.2 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 9140 mm |