- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Tigercat 230C vs. Caterpillar 330D FM
Tigercat 230C vs. Caterpillar 330D FM
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 230C:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 8 rev / min and 6.3 rev / min | 21 % more or 1.7 rev |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 330D FM:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 600 l. and 378 l. | 37 % more or 222 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 410 l. and 227.1 l. | 45 % more or 182.9 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 199.8 kW and 119.3 kW | 40 % more or 80.5 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
Maximum radius on ground level | 12800 mm and 9140 mm | 29 % more or 3660 mm |
Maximum height | 15000 mm and 7600 mm | 49 % more or 7400 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 2590 mm and 3650 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm and 3490 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 80 amperes |
Working weight | 13063.5 kg and 45801 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSB6.7 3 level and C9 Acert |
Boom/section specifications 1
Option - Boom/Section 1 | boom and Under/Under |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 2590 mm | 2. Overall width | 3650 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 2410 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3490 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
9. Maximum height | 7600 mm | 9. Maximum height | 15600 mm |
10. Maximum radius on ground level | 9140 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 13500 mm |