- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Bomag BF6615 vs. Ingersoll Rand PF5510
Bomag BF6615 vs. Ingersoll Rand PF5510
8 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF5510:
Sizes
| Caterpillar track width | 482.6 mm and 356 mm | 26 % more or 126.6 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 204 l. and 132 l. | 35 % more or 72 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 26.5 l. and 13 l. | 51 % more or 13.5 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 204 l. and 95 l. | 53 % more or 109 l. |
Hopper/stacker
| Maximum paving width | 9140 mm and 4600 mm | 50 % more or 4540 mm |
| Maximum coating thickness | 304.8 mm and 203 mm | 33 % more or 101.8 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 70.1 m/min and 55 m/min | 22 % more or 15.1 m/min |
| Maximum travel speed | 16.1 km/h and 6.6 km/h | 59 % more or 9.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Transport height | 1880 mm and 2920 mm |
| Length with screed | 4648 mm and 5940 mm |
| Transport width | 2591 mm and 3050 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight with screed | 9298.6 kg and 16760.2 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 2400 mm and 3050 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 4648 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5940 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2591 mm | 2. Transport width | 3050 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 1880 mm | 3. Transport height | 2920 mm |