vs.

      Caterpillar AP1055D vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6170

      3 reasons to buy Caterpillar AP1055D:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 461.8 l. and 302.8 l. 34 % more or 159.0 l.

      Motor

      Effective power 164.8 kW and 152.9 kW 7 % more or 11.9 kW
      Power measured at 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 18 % more or 400 rev

      4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6170:

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 236.6 l. and 149.1 l. 37 % more or 87.5 l.

      Hopper/stacker

      Hopper volume 6.5 m3 and 6.1 m3 6 % more or 0.4 m3
      Maximum paving speed 90.5 m/min and 67.1 m/min 26 % more or 23.4 m/min
      Maximum travel speed 19.3 km/h and 14.5 km/h 25 % more or 4.8 km/h

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Transport height 2820 mm and 3556 mm
      Length with screed 6540 mm and 5232 mm
      Width with open hopper 3310 mm and 3277 mm
      Transport width 3330 mm and 2997 mm

      Operation

      Operating weight without screed 17046 kg and 16384.7 kg
      Operational weight with screed 20470.6 kg and 18439.4 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Cummins
      Model C7 and QSB 6.7 3 level

      Hopper/stacker

      Auger conveyor diameter 406.4 mm and 431.8 mm
      Paving width in folded state 3048 mm and 3050 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Length with screed 6540 mm 1. Length with screed 5232 mm
      2. Transport width 3330 mm 2. Transport width 2997 mm
      3. Transport height 2820 mm 3. Transport height 3556 mm