- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Caterpillar BG240C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
Caterpillar BG240C vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar BG240C:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
6 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6160:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 303 l. and 265 l. | 13 % more or 38 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 236.6 l. and 189 l. | 20 % more or 47.6 l. |
Hopper/stacker
| Hopper volume | 6.5 m3 and 6.1 m3 | 6 % more or 0.4 m3 |
| Maximum paving width | 7920 mm and 7315 mm | 8 % more or 605 mm |
| Maximum paving speed | 90.5 m/min and 76 m/min | 16 % more or 14.5 m/min |
| Maximum travel speed | 19.3 km/h and 16 km/h | 17 % more or 3.3 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm and 2616 mm |
| Length with screed | 6783 mm and 5232 mm |
| Transport width | 2438 mm and 2997 mm |
| Transport height | 2769 mm and 3556 mm |
| Tyre size | 16X22 Front 18.00x25-16PR Rear and 18x25 |
Operation
| Operating weight without screed | 14830 kg and 16384.7 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3054DIT and QSB 6.7 3 level |
Hopper/stacker
| Paving width in folded state | 2438 mm and 3050 mm |
| Auger conveyor diameter | 406 mm and 432 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 6783 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5232 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2438 mm | 2. Transport width | 2997 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 2769 mm | 3. Transport height | 3556 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2616 mm |