- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Dynapac F30CE vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
Dynapac F30CE vs. Ingersoll Rand PF6160
2 reasons to buy Dynapac F30CE:
Hopper/stacker
Hopper volume | 7.5 m3 and 6.5 m3 | 13 % more or 1.0 m3 |
Maximum paving width | 16000 mm and 7920 mm | 50 % more or 8080 mm |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6160:
Hopper/stacker
Maximum coating thickness | 304.8 mm and 300 mm | 2 % more or 4.8 mm |
Maximum paving speed | 90.5 m/min and 20 m/min | 78 % more or 70.5 m/min |
Maximum travel speed | 19.3 km/h and 4.4 km/h | 77 % more or 14.9 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Width with open hopper | 3600 mm and 3277 mm |
Transport width | 3000 mm and 2997 mm |
Transport height | 2890 mm and 3556 mm |
Length with screed | 6365 mm and 5232 mm |
Operation
Operational weight with screed | 19504.5 kg and 18303.4 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSC 8.3 and QSB 6.7 3 level |
Hopper/stacker
Paving width in folded state | 3000 mm and 3050 mm |
Auger conveyor diameter | 410 mm and 432 mm |
Images
Sizes
3. Transport height | 2890 mm | 3. Transport height | 3556 mm |
1. Length with screed | 6365 mm | 1. Length with screed | 5232 mm |
2. Transport width | 3000 mm | 2. Transport width | 2997 mm |