- Home/
- Comparison/
- Asphalt Spreader/
- Ingersoll Rand PF6170 vs. Caterpillar AP1055D
Ingersoll Rand PF6170 vs. Caterpillar AP1055D
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PF6170:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 236.6 l. and 149.1 l. | 37 % more or 87.5 l. |
Hopper/stacker
| Hopper volume | 6.5 m3 and 6.1 m3 | 6 % more or 0.4 m3 |
| Maximum paving speed | 90.5 m/min and 67.1 m/min | 26 % more or 23.4 m/min |
| Maximum travel speed | 19.3 km/h and 14.5 km/h | 25 % more or 4.8 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar AP1055D:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 461.8 l. and 302.8 l. | 34 % more or 159.0 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 164.8 kW and 152.9 kW | 7 % more or 11.9 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width with open hopper | 3277 mm and 3310 mm |
| Transport height | 3556 mm and 2820 mm |
| Length with screed | 5232 mm and 6540 mm |
| Transport width | 2997 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Operating weight without screed | 16384.7 kg and 17046 kg |
| Operational weight with screed | 18439.4 kg and 20470.6 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB 6.7 3 level and C7 |
Hopper/stacker
| Auger conveyor diameter | 431.8 mm and 406.4 mm |
| Paving width in folded state | 3050 mm and 3048 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with screed | 5232 mm | 1. Length with screed | 6540 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2997 mm | 2. Transport width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 3556 mm | 3. Transport height | 2820 mm |