- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PF200 vs. Caterpillar PS150C
Caterpillar PF200 vs. Caterpillar PS150C
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar PF200:
Weight
| Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 2000 kg and 1440 kg | 28 % more or 560 kg |
Sizes
| Clearance | 350 mm and 267 mm | 24 % more or 83 mm |
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 9.5 l. and 7.3 l. | 23 % more or 2.2 l. |
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
| Operational weight with maximum ballast | 12940 kg and 14000 kg | 8 % less or 1060 kg |
Tyres
| Front tyres number | 5 and 3 | 40 % more or 2 |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 173 l. and 160 l. | 8 % more or 13 l. |
| Water spraying tank fluid volume | 394 l. and 350 l. | 11 % more or 44 l. |
| Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 24 km/h | 6 % more or 1.6 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 75 kW and 49.2 kW | 34 % more or 25.8 kW |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.8 l. | 14 % more or 0.6 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Operational weight in folded state | 7000 kg and 4885 kg |
Tyres
| Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
| Standard tyre size | 11x80-20/C20 and 8.50/90x15 6 layers |
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4500 mm and 4290 mm |
| Overall width | 1720 mm and 1740 mm |
| Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm and 3000 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3200 mm and 3340 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Caterpillar |
| Model | F4L 912 and 3054C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4500 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1720 mm | 2. Overall width | 1740 mm |
| 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3200 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 350 mm | 5. Clearance | 267 mm |