- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Caterpillar PS150C vs. Caterpillar PS300C
Caterpillar PS150C vs. Caterpillar PS300C
9 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS150C:
Weight
Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 545 kg and 1360.8 kg | 60 % less or 815.8 kg |
Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 1440 kg and 1134 kg | 21 % more or 306 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 5 and 3 | 40 % more or 2 |
Rear tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Sizes
Clearance | 267 mm and 250 mm | 6 % more or 17 mm |
Operation
Maximum speed | 25.6 km/h and 19 km/h | 26 % more or 6.6 km/h |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 54.9 l. and 10 l. | 82 % more or 44.9 l. |
Motor
Full power | 75 kW and 74.6 kW | 1 % more or 0.4 kW |
Effective power | 72 kW and 63.4 kW | 12 % more or 8.6 kW |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar PS300C:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 1134 kg and 12940 kg | 91 % less or 11806 kg |
Operation
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 460 l. and 394 l. | 14 % more or 66 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 215 l. and 173 l. | 20 % more or 42 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 28 l. and 16.1 l. | 42 % more or 11.9 l. |
Engine oil volume | 9 l. and 7.3 l. | 19 % more or 1.7 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 4885 kg and 6350.3 kg |
Sizes
Wheelbase | 3340 mm and 4030 mm |
Dimensional length | 4290 mm and 5300 mm |
Overall width | 1740 mm and 2000 mm |
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm and 3000 mm |
Motor
Model | 3054C and 3054C turbocharging diesel motor |
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 4.4 l. |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4290 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5300 mm |
2. Overall width | 1740 mm | 2. Overall width | 2000 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3000 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3340 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 4030 mm |
5. Clearance | 267 mm | 5. Clearance | 250 mm |