- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Dynapac CP22 vs. Ingersoll Rand PT125R
Dynapac CP22 vs. Ingersoll Rand PT125R
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CP22:
Weight
Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 3000 kg and 1227 kg | 59 % more or 1773 kg |
7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT125R:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 7580 kg and 21000 kg | 64 % less or 13420 kg |
Mean weight per wheel in folded state | 458 kg and 1151 kg | 60 % less or 693 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Rear tyres number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
Sizes
Clearance | 330 mm and 230 mm | 30 % more or 100 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 379 l. and 154 l. | 59 % more or 225 l. |
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 379 l. and 370 l. | 2 % more or 9 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 8060 kg and 4125 kg |
Tyres
Standard tyre size | 11.00X20-18 layers and 7.5-15, 14 layers |
Wheel track/tyre overlap | 42 mm and 12 mm |
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4950 mm and 3895 mm |
Overall width | 1820 mm and 1980 mm |
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2680 mm and 3225 mm |
Wheelbase | 3795 mm and 2920 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Cummins |
Model | OM-366 and B 3.3T-85 |
Images
Sizes
5. Clearance | 230 mm | 5. Clearance | 330 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 4950 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3895 mm |
2. Overall width | 1820 mm | 2. Overall width | 1980 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2680 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3225 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3795 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2920 mm |