- Home/
- Comparison/
- Rubber-Tired Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Caterpillar PF200
Ingersoll Rand PT240R vs. Caterpillar PF200
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand PT240R:
Weight
Mean weight per wheel with maximum ballast load | 2970 kg and 2000 kg | 33 % more or 970 kg |
Tyres
Front tyres number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 160 l. | 36 % more or 90 l. |
Motor
Full power | 73.8 kW and 49.2 kW | 33 % more or 24.6 kW |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar PF200:
Weight
Operational weight with maximum ballast | 14000 kg and 24000 kg | 42 % less or 10000 kg |
Sizes
Clearance | 350 mm and 300 mm | 14 % more or 50 mm |
Operation
Water spraying tank fluid volume | 350 l. and 285 l. | 19 % more or 65 l. |
Maximum speed | 24 km/h and 19 km/h | 21 % more or 5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
Operational weight in folded state | 16360 kg and 7000 kg |
Tyres
Rear tyres number | 4 and 4 |
Standard tyre size | 11X20 18 layers and 11x80-20/C20 |
Sizes
Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm and 2930 mm |
Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3200 mm |
Dimensional length | 5440 mm and 4500 mm |
Overall width | 2310 mm and 1720 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | BT and Deutz |
Model | Cummins 4.5-C99 and F4L 912 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 5440 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4500 mm |
2. Overall width | 2310 mm | 2. Overall width | 1720 mm |
3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 3040 mm | 3. Rollover protection system height to upper part | 2930 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3200 mm |
5. Clearance | 300 mm | 5. Clearance | 350 mm |