- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Caterpillar CP433E vs. Hamm 3205P
Caterpillar CP433E vs. Hamm 3205P
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP433E:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 1.6 mm and 1.2 mm | 25 % more or 0.4 mm |
High centrifugal force | 134 kN and 69 kN | 49 % more or 65 kN |
Motor
Full power | 75 kW and 48 kW | 36 % more or 27 kW |
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 2.9 l. | 34 % more or 1.5 l. |
2 reasons to buy Hamm 3205P:
Roller
Low centrifugal force | 69 kN and 67 kN | 3 % more or 2 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 175 l. and 160 l. | 9 % more or 15 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 4960 mm and 4355 mm |
Between tyres width | 1650 mm and 1480 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2970 mm and 2775 mm |
Roller
Pads number | 108 and 84 |
Pad height | 90 mm and 80 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 31.9 Hz and 42 Hz |
Roller width | 1676 mm and 1370 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 7390 kg and 5730 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Deutz |
Model | 3054C and TD2011 |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 4960 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 4355 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 1650 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1480 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2970 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2775 mm |