- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Dynapac CA134PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD160F
Dynapac CA134PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD160F
6 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD160F:
Sizes
Clearance | 635 mm and 213 mm | 66 % more or 422 mm |
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 1.7 mm and 1.5 mm | 12 % more or 0.2 mm |
High centrifugal force | 339 kN and 89 kN | 74 % more or 250 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 117 l. | 54 % more or 140 l. |
Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 6 km/h | 53 % more or 6.7 km/h |
Motor
Full power | 129 kW and 62 kW | 52 % more or 67 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 3958 mm and 5994 mm |
Between tyres width | 1390 mm and 2486 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2519 mm and 3180 mm |
Wheelbase | 1859 mm and 3099 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 1370 mm and 2134 mm |
Roller diameter | 1000 mm and 1499 mm |
Pads number | 72 and 120 |
Pad height | 76 mm and 127 mm |
Pad surface area | 8400 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 35 Hz and 20.8 Hz |
Operation
Tyre | 12.5-20 and 23.1x26-8PR R1 |
Working weight | 4750 kg and 16508 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 5030 TF270 and B5.9-TAA |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 3958 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5994 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 1390 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2519 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1859 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3099 mm |
5. Clearance | 213 mm | 5. Clearance | 635 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1000 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm |