- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Dynapac CA250PD vs. Caterpillar CP563
Dynapac CA250PD vs. Caterpillar CP563
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA250PD:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 300 kN and 222.4 kN | 26 % more or 77.6 kN |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP563:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 155.7 kN and 146 kN | 6 % more or 9.7 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 254 l. and 250 l. | 2 % more or 4 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.8 km/h and 5 km/h | 61 % more or 7.8 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 108.1 kW and 82 kW | 24 % more or 26.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 2130 mm and 2440 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2977 mm and 2997 mm |
Roller
| Roller diameter | 1523 mm and 1549 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 30 Hz |
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2130 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 12200 kg and 11580 kg |
| Tyre | 23.1x26 and 23.1x26 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB 4.5 and 3116 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2440 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2977 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2997 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1523 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1549 mm |