- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Dynapac CA602PD vs. Hamm 3307P
Dynapac CA602PD vs. Hamm 3307P
6 reasons to buy Dynapac CA602PD:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 1.8 mm and 1.7 mm | 6 % more or 0.1 mm |
High centrifugal force | 317 kN and 124 kN | 61 % more or 193 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 175 l. | 45 % more or 145 l. |
Motor
Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Full power | 142 kW and 68 kW | 52 % more or 74 kW |
Displacement | 6.7 l. and 2.9 l. | 57 % more or 3.8 l. |
1 reasons to buy Hamm 3307P:
Motor
Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 21 % more or 600 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 6000 mm and 4680 mm |
Between tyres width | 2130 mm and 1790 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3000 mm and 2790 mm |
Roller
Vibrations frequency 1 | 29 Hz and 42 Hz |
Roller width | 2130 mm and 1680 mm |
Pads number | 130 and 112 |
Pad height | 100 mm and 80 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 18600 kg and 7050 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and TD2011 |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 6000 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 4680 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 1790 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm |