- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3205P vs. Dynapac CA500PD
Hamm 3205P vs. Dynapac CA500PD
1 reasons to buy Hamm 3205P:
Motor
Power measured at | 2500 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 12 % more or 300 rev |
5 reasons to buy Dynapac CA500PD:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 300 kN and 69 kN | 77 % more or 231 kN |
Low centrifugal force | 238 kN and 69 kN | 71 % more or 169 kN |
High nominal amplitude | 1.7 mm and 1.2 mm | 29 % more or 0.5 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 175 l. | 45 % more or 145 l. |
Motor
Full power | 129 kW and 48 kW | 63 % more or 81 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 4355 mm and 6000 mm |
Between tyres width | 1480 mm and 2130 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2775 mm and 2990 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 1370 mm and 2130 mm |
Pads number | 84 and 130 |
Pad height | 80 mm and 100 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 42 Hz and 29 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 5730 kg and 15500 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
Model | TD2011 and BT 6A 5.9-C |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 4355 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 6000 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 1480 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2775 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm |