- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Hamm 3518P vs. Dynapac CA362PD
Hamm 3518P vs. Dynapac CA362PD
2 reasons to buy Hamm 3518P:
Motor
Full power | 155 kW and 112 kW | 28 % more or 43 kW |
Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA362PD:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 300 l. | 6 % more or 20 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 6210 mm and 5758 mm |
Between tyres width | 2390 mm and 2130 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm and 2996 mm |
Roller
Pads number | 150 and 150 |
Pad height | 100 mm and 100 mm |
Pad surface area | 15400 mm2 and 14600 mm2 |
Roller width | 2220 mm and 2130 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 17920 kg and 13100 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
Model | TCD2012 and QSB 6.7 T3 |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 6210 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5758 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2390 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2996 mm |