- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Caterpillar CP663E
Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Caterpillar CP663E
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
Low centrifugal force | 262 kN and 166 kN | 37 % more or 96 kN |
High nominal amplitude | 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm | 14 % more or 0.3 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 83.3 l. and 80 l. | 4 % more or 3.3 l. |
Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 55 amperes | 42 % more or 40 amperes |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 332 kN and 270 kN | 19 % more or 62 kN |
Operation
Maximum speed | 11.4 km/h and 10.3 km/h | 10 % more or 1.1 km/h |
Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257.4 l. | 14 % more or 42.6 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 123 kW and 93.2 kW | 24 % more or 29.8 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 5892 mm and 6000 mm |
Between tyres width | 2286 mm and 2370 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 3100 mm |
Wheelbase | 3100 mm and 2900 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2134 mm and 2134 mm |
Roller diameter | 1499 mm and 1295 mm |
Pads number | 120 and 140 |
Pad height | 102 mm and 127 mm |
Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 8940 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 27.6 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
Tyre | 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 587x660mm |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
Working weight | 11385.2 kg and 16800 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | B3.9 TAA 2 level and 3056E |
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 5892 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 6000 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2370 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2900 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm |