vs.

      Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Caterpillar CP663E

      4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:

      Roller

      Low centrifugal force 262 kN and 166 kN 37 % more or 96 kN
      High nominal amplitude 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm 14 % more or 0.3 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 83.3 l. and 80 l. 4 % more or 3.3 l.
      Generator current strength 95 amperes and 55 amperes 42 % more or 40 amperes

      4 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:

      Roller

      High centrifugal force 332 kN and 270 kN 19 % more or 62 kN

      Operation

      Maximum speed 11.4 km/h and 10.3 km/h 10 % more or 1.1 km/h
      Fuel Capacity 300 l. and 257.4 l. 14 % more or 42.6 l.

      Motor

      Effective power 123 kW and 93.2 kW 24 % more or 29.8 kW

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Overall length without blade 5892 mm and 6000 mm
      Between tyres width 2286 mm and 2370 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3146 mm and 3100 mm
      Wheelbase 3100 mm and 2900 mm

      Roller

      Roller width 2134 mm and 2134 mm
      Roller diameter 1499 mm and 1295 mm
      Pads number 120 and 140
      Pad height 102 mm and 127 mm
      Pad surface area 13548.4 mm2 and 8940 mm2
      Vibrations frequency 1 27.6 Hz and 30 Hz

      Operation

      Tyre 23.1x26 8PR R1 and 587x660mm
      Operating voltage 12 V and 24 V
      Working weight 11385.2 kg and 16800 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Caterpillar
      Model B3.9 TAA 2 level and 3056E
      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Overall length without blade 5892 mm 1. Overall length without blade 6000 mm
      2. Between tyres width 2286 mm 2. Between tyres width 2370 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3146 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3100 mm
      4. Wheelbase 3100 mm 4. Wheelbase 2900 mm

      Roller

      6. Roller diameter 1499 mm 6. Roller diameter 1295 mm