- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Hamm 3516P
Ingersoll Rand SD105F vs. Hamm 3516P
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD105F:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2.1 mm and 1.9 mm | 10 % more or 0.2 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 270 kN and 256 kN | 5 % more or 14 kN |
1 reasons to buy Hamm 3516P:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257.4 l. | 14 % more or 42.6 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall length without blade | 5892 mm and 6075 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2286 mm and 2270 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm and 2950 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 2140 mm |
| Pads number | 120 and 150 |
| Pad height | 102 mm and 100 mm |
| Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 15400 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 27.6 Hz and 40 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 11385.2 kg and 15850 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
| Model | B3.9 TAA 2 level and BF6M2012C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5892 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 6075 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2286 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2270 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm |