vs.

      Ingersoll Rand SD160F vs. Dynapac CA260PD

      6 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD160F:

      Sizes

      Clearance 635 mm and 453 mm 29 % more or 182 mm

      Roller

      High nominal amplitude 1.7 mm and 1.6 mm 6 % more or 0.1 mm
      High centrifugal force 339 kN and 300 kN 12 % more or 39 kN
      Low centrifugal force 257 kN and 146 kN 43 % more or 111 kN

      Operation

      Maximum speed 12.7 km/h and 9 km/h 29 % more or 3.7 km/h

      Motor

      Full power 129 kW and 112 kW 13 % more or 17 kW

      1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA260PD:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 320 l. and 257 l. 20 % more or 63 l.

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Wheelbase 3099 mm and 2870 mm
      Overall length without blade 5994 mm and 5758 mm
      Between tyres width 2486 mm and 2130 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3180 mm and 2977 mm

      Roller

      Roller width 2134 mm and 2130 mm
      Roller diameter 1499 mm and 1523 mm
      Pads number 120 and 130
      Pad height 127 mm and 100 mm
      Pad surface area 13548.4 mm2 and 14600 mm2
      Vibrations frequency 1 20.8 Hz and 33 Hz

      Operation

      Tyre 23.1x26-8PR R1 and 23.1x26
      Working weight 16508 kg and 12700 kg

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Cummins
      Model B5.9-TAA and QSB 6.7

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Overall length without blade 5994 mm 1. Overall length without blade 5758 mm
      2. Between tyres width 2486 mm 2. Between tyres width 2130 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3180 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 2977 mm
      4. Wheelbase 3099 mm 4. Wheelbase 2870 mm
      5. Clearance 635 mm 5. Clearance 453 mm

      Roller

      6. Roller diameter 1499 mm 6. Roller diameter 1523 mm