- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Dynapac CA250P
Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Dynapac CA250P
7 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Sizes
Clearance | 584 mm and 400 mm | 32 % more or 184 mm |
Roller
Low centrifugal force | 273 kN and 146 kN | 47 % more or 127 kN |
High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.6 mm | 20 % more or 0.4 mm |
High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 300 kN | 16 % more or 59 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 250 l. | 3 % more or 7 l. |
Maximum speed | 12.6 km/h and 7.5 km/h | 40 % more or 5.1 km/h |
Motor
Full power | 152.9 kW and 82 kW | 46 % more or 70.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 2952 mm |
Wheelbase | 3215 mm and 2870 mm |
Between tyres width | 2486 mm and 2130 mm |
Roller
Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 14600 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 33 Hz |
Roller width | 2134 mm and 2130 mm |
Roller diameter | 1621 mm and 1523 mm |
Pads number | 136 and 130 |
Operation
Working weight | 20181 kg and 12000 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x26-10PR R1 and 23.1x26 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB5.9-TAA and QSB 4.5 |
Images
Sizes
2. Between tyres width | 2486 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2130 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2952 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3215 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2870 mm |
5. Clearance | 584 mm | 5. Clearance | 400 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1621 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1523 mm |