- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Vibromax VM116PD
Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Vibromax VM116PD
4 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Sizes
Clearance | 584 mm and 447 mm | 23 % more or 137 mm |
Roller
High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 305 kN | 15 % more or 54 kN |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 104 l. and 80 l. | 23 % more or 24 l. |
Motor
Full power | 152.9 kW and 112 kW | 27 % more or 40.9 kW |
2 reasons to buy Vibromax VM116PD:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 400 l. and 257 l. | 36 % more or 143 l. |
Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 12.6 km/h | 1 % more or 0.1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 2935 mm |
Wheelbase | 3215 mm and 2996 mm |
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 2 mm |
Oscillation frequency 2 | 28.3 Hz and 36 Hz |
Roller width | 2134 mm and 2100 mm |
Roller diameter | 1621 mm and 1400 mm |
Pads number | 136 and 132 |
Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 29 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 20181 kg and 13400 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x26-10PR R1 and 23.1-26/8PR |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 95 amperes |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB5.9-TAA and B 5.9-150 C |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3215 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2996 mm |
5. Clearance | 584 mm | 5. Clearance | 447 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1621 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1400 mm |