- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA262D vs. Vibromax 1805D
Dynapac CA262D vs. Vibromax 1805D
5 reasons to buy Vibromax 1805D:
Sizes
| Clearance | 460 mm and 400 mm | 13 % more or 60 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 397 l. and 320 l. | 19 % more or 77 l. |
| Maximum speed | 11.8 km/h and 9 km/h | 24 % more or 2.8 km/h |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
| Full power | 138 kW and 112 kW | 19 % more or 26 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2974 mm and 3255 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2879 mm and 2965 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5758 mm and 5690 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 29 Hz |
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2100 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1523 mm and 1600 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 26.3 kg/cm and 53.8 kg/cm |
Operation
| Working weight | 10700 kg and 11300 kg |
| Tyres (if applicable) | 23.1x26 and 23.1x20-26 8PR |
Motor
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and 6BT5.9C |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2974 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3255 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2879 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2965 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 400 mm | 5. Clearance | 460 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 5758 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5690 mm |
