- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA300 vs. Dynapac CG233HF
Dynapac CA300 vs. Dynapac CG233HF
5 reasons to buy Dynapac CA300:
Sizes
Clearance | 400 mm and 270 mm | 32 % more or 130 mm |
Roller
High centrifugal force | 300 kN and 89 kN | 70 % more or 211 kN |
Low centrifugal force | 146 kN and 68 kN | 53 % more or 78 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 100 l. | 60 % more or 150 l. |
Motor
Full power | 82 kW and 62 kW | 24 % more or 20 kW |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CG233HF:
Operation
Maximum speed | 12 km/h and 7.5 km/h | 37 % more or 4.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 5550 mm and 3900 mm |
Overall width | 2130 mm and 1575 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm and 2950 mm |
Wheelbase | 2879 mm and 2775 mm |
Roller
Roller diameter | 1543 mm and 1120 mm |
Static line-distributed load | 36.8 kg/cm and 28.3 kg/cm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 54 Hz |
Roller width | 2130 mm and 1450 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 12300 kg and 8200 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
Model | 4A BT3.9-C and BF4M 2011 |
Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and diesel engine with air cooling |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 2879 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2775 mm |
5. Clearance | 400 mm | 5. Clearance | 270 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 5550 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3900 mm |
2. Overall width | 2130 mm | 2. Overall width | 1575 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm |