- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CC624HFCE vs. Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA
Dynapac CC624HFCE vs. Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CC624HFCE:
Operation
Maximum speed | 12 km/h and 10.6 km/h | 12 % more or 1.4 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA:
Roller
Low centrifugal force | 170.3 kN and 61 kN | 64 % more or 109.3 kN |
High centrifugal force | 199.8 kN and 116 kN | 42 % more or 83.8 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 257.4 l. and 240 l. | 7 % more or 17.4 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4990 mm and 6195 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm and 3200 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 2130 mm and 2135 mm |
Roller diameter | 1300 mm and 1500 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 43 Hz and 41.7 Hz |
Vibrations frequency 2 | 62 Hz and 56.7 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 12600 kg and 15333 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB 4.5 T3 and QSB 5.9-C |
Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and 6 cylinder engine with turbocharging and charge air cooling |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4990 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 6195 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3200 mm |