- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA vs. Dynapac CA250
Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA vs. Dynapac CA250
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA:
Roller
Low centrifugal force | 170.3 kN and 119 kN | 30 % more or 51.3 kN |
Operation
Maximum speed | 10.6 km/h and 7.5 km/h | 29 % more or 3.1 km/h |
Fuel Capacity | 257.4 l. and 250 l. | 3 % more or 7.4 l. |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA250:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 246 kN and 199.8 kN | 19 % more or 46.2 kN |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 6195 mm and 5550 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3200 mm and 2952 mm |
Roller
Vibrations frequency 1 | 41.7 Hz and 33 Hz |
Roller width | 2135 mm and 2130 mm |
Roller diameter | 1500 mm and 1523 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 15333 kg and 10600 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSB 5.9-C and QSB 4.5 |
Aspiration | 6 cylinder engine with turbocharging and charge air cooling and water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 6195 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5550 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3200 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2952 mm |