- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA vs. Vibromax VM106PD
Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA vs. Vibromax VM106PD
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 132 l. and 80 l. | 39 % more or 52 l. |
| Maximum speed | 10.6 km/h and 10.5 km/h | 1 % more or 0.1 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Vibromax VM106PD:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257.4 l. | 14 % more or 42.6 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3200 mm and 2935 mm |
| Dimensional length | 6195 mm and 5444 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2135 mm and 2100 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1500 mm and 1500 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 41.7 Hz and 31 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 56.7 Hz and 36 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 15333 kg and 11600 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 95 amperes |
Motor
| Aspiration | 6 cylinder engine with turbocharging and charge air cooling and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB 5.9-C and B 3.9-125 C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 6195 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5444 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3200 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm |