- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Vibromax VM66PD vs. Dynapac CC232HF
Vibromax VM66PD vs. Dynapac CC232HF
2 reasons to buy Vibromax VM66PD:
Sizes
| Clearance | 389 mm and 270 mm | 31 % more or 119 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 230 l. and 120 l. | 48 % more or 110 l. |
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CC232HF:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 13 km/h and 11 km/h | 15 % more or 2 km/h |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 21 % more or 600 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4887 mm and 4300 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm and 2920 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2514 mm and 3180 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1750 mm and 1575 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 36 Hz and 71 Hz |
| Roller diameter | 1220 mm and 1120 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 29 Hz and 51 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 7600 kg and 8400 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 60 kW and 60 kW |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbo diesel with air cooling |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
| Model | B 3.3 and BF4L 2011 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4887 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4300 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2920 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2514 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3180 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 389 mm | 5. Clearance | 270 mm |