- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 4200 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 4200 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
2 reasons to buy International 4200 4x2 (2004):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 6653.8 mm and 7200 mm | 8 % less or 546.2 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 6197.5 mm and 6900 mm | 10 % less or 702.5 mm |
3 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Peak torque | 2200 Nm and 1559.2 Nm | 29 % more or 640.8 Nm |
| Full power | 387.8 kW and 316.9 kW | 18 % more or 70.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Dimensional length | 5562.6 mm and 6285 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 990.6 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 9752.2 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 3690.9 kg and 7780 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 4100 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 3251.2 mm and 3900 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5257.8 mm and 6085 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 990.6 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 9752.2 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 3667.7 kg and 7690 kg |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 6 and 8 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Volvo |
| Model | ISM (425 HP) and D13A520 (520 HP) |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Allison and Volvo |
| Model | 1000 HS and V2514 |
Images