- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 4200 LP 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 4200 LP 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
1 reasons to buy International 4200 LP 4x2 (2004):
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 6681.2 mm and 6900 mm | 3 % less or 218.8 mm |
4 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 7796.8 mm | 8 % less or 596.8 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Peak torque | 2500 Nm and 894.8 Nm | 64 % more or 1605.2 Nm |
| Full power | 387.8 kW and 238.6 kW | 38 % more or 149.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Dimensional length | 6477 mm and 6285 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1600.2 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 8917.6 kg and 23400 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3860.8 mm and 4100 mm |
| Chassis total weight | 3535.3 kg and 7780 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Total gross vehicle weight | 8917.6 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 3566.1 kg and 7690 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3900 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5562.6 mm and 6085 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 990.6 mm and 825 mm |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 6 and 8 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Volvo |
| Model | ISM (320 HP) and D13A480 (480 HP) |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Allison and Volvo |
| Model | 1000 HS and V2514 |
Images